When a material is used in the definition of a laminate, assumptions are made about the axes defined in the laminate. Axes 1 and 2 are parallel to the laminate plane and axis 3 is orthogonal to the laminate.
The classical laminate analysis is based on the assumption that the relation between stress and strain tensors is linear. Then, as these two tensors are symmetric, a matrix contains all the elastic coefficients defining the material:
|
| (II.1.11) |
It can be shown that, owing to the particular choice of angular strain tensor components, the matrix containing the elastic coefficients is symmetric. Therefore, the matrix has only 21 independent coefficients. is the stiffness matrix of the material.
Equation (II.1.11) can be reversed as follows:
In expression (12), the thermo-elastic and moisture expansion terms have been added to the previous expression. They are characterized by CTE and CME tensors noted and respectively. Note that shear components of these two tensors are angular components. Practically, it does not matter much as most materials have zero shear components for CTE or CME tensors. is the compliance matrix of the material. Obviously . Laminates are often defined with orthotropic materials:
For a fabric, 1 corresponds generally to the warp direction, and 2 to the weft direction. The corresponding tensile/compressive moduli are noted and respectively. denotes the out-of-plane tensile/compressive modulus.
Correspondingly, shear moduli , and are defined.
In general six Poisson coefficients can be defined: , , , , , . However, these coefficients are not independent. The relations
|
| (II.1.13) |
|
| (II.1.14) |
|
| (II.1.15) |
allow elimination of the coefficients , and , so that only the three Poisson coefficients , and need to be specified when defining a material.
The constitutive equation of an orthotropic material is given by
For an isotropic material, defining and either or is sufficient to characterize the material, and one has:
|
|
|
|
|
|
, and satisfy the following relation:
|
|
Finally, shorter notations are introduced to rewrite expressions (II.1.11) and (12) respectively as follows:
|
| (II.1.17) |
|
|
The “Mechanical Strain Tensor” is also introduced, estimated as follows:
|
| (II.1.18) |
This new strain tensor differs from the one defined by (II.1.17) by the fact that no thermo-elastic or hygro-elastic contribution is taken into account to estimate its components. It is the strain that corresponds to the actual material stress, when no thermo-elastic or hygro-elastic expansion is considered. This “Mechanical Strain Tensor” is also sometimes called “Equivalent Strain Tensor”.